The Exclusion of Restorative Justice in the Handling of Child Sexual Abuse Cases under Indonesian National Law

Authors

  • Arnis Pratiwi Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia.

Keywords:

Restorative Justice, Criminal Law, Child Molestation, Child Protection

Abstract

Restorative justice is no longer a foreign term, especially as an alternative for resolving criminal cases. It is a process that emphasizes restoring conditions to their original state. In its implementation, restoratiuve justices involves the offender, the victim, the families of both, and other relevant parties, working together to achieve justice. However, certain types of crimes are excluded from this approach. Not all criminal cases can be resolved through restorative justice. In particular, in the context of child molestation, this approach is explicity excluded, as it considered incompatible with the goals of victim protection and substantive justice. Nevertheless, customary settlement practices for such cases still exist in society. This article aims to examine the legal basis ffor the exclusion of restorative justice in child molestation cases and the legal reasoning behind these limitations. This study employs a normative juridical method and a literature review based on statutory regulations and academic sources. The findings that restorative justice practices in child molestation cases must be strictly limited to avoid injustice and violations of child victims rights.

References

Gultom, M. (2014). Legal protection of children and women. Refika Aditama.

Hartanto, S., & Winata, B. (2023). Revictimization in the juvenile justice system: The impact of resolving child sexual abuse cases through restorative justice. Jurnal Hukum Anak, 28(1), 44–59.

Indonesia. (2012). Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.

Indonesia. (2014). Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.

Indonesian National Police. (2021). Regulation of the Indonesian National Police Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Criminal Offenses Based on Restorative Justice.

Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Regulation of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 concerning the Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice.

Liebmann, M. (2011). Restorative justice: How it works. Routledge.

Marlina. (2010). Introduction to the concepts of diversion and restorative justice in criminal law. USU Press.

Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2016). Criminal theories and policies. Alumni.

Prasetyo, E., & Lestari, H. (2023). The application of restorative justice in cases of child sexual violence: A review of law and practice. Jurnal Peradilan Pidana, 29(2), 77–92.

Pratama, Y., & Harahap, I. (2023). An evaluation of the application of restorative justice in cases of child sexual violence in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Anak, 19(3), 205–218.

Sari, R., & Nugroho, D. (2024). An analysis of the application of restorative justice in cases of child sexual offenses: Perspectives on child protection and human rights. Jurnal Peradilan Anak, 26(1), 45–58.

Setyowati, A., & Pranoto, B. (2020). Psychological impacts on child victims of sexual violence: A theoretical and empirical review. Jurnal Psikologi Anak dan Remaja, 15(3), 112–130.

Sembiring, S., & Ginting, P. (2024). Long-term trauma among child victims of sexual violence: Psychological implications and intervention recommendations. Jurnal Psikologi Klinis Anak, 22(1), 87–102.

Sutarno, A. (2023). A legal analysis of restorative justice in child sexual abuse cases: Perspectives on child protection and deterrent effects on offenders. Jurnal Hukum Anak, 25(2), 150–165.

United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations General Assembly.

Wibisono, A., & Sari, R. (2022). Restorative justice in cases of child sexual violence: A review of psychological approaches and victim protection. Jurnal Peradilan Anak, 18(4), 120–132.

Published

2026-10-05